
Cox rated him 175 for ages 17 to 26, 1 point below 176. Cox's childhood rating for him was 150.
An IQ of 176 is higher than about 99.999979% of people, roughly 1 in 4,940,195. The bell curve predicts only about 14 people at this level in the whole of the UK. It is also the kind of number that appears when Catharine Cox's historical estimates are "corrected", a step worth understanding before you trust any famous 170-plus.
At 76 points above the mean of 100 (5.07 standard deviations), 176 sits where the curve has almost flattened onto the axis. Only 0.00002% of people score here or higher; on the left chart that group is the barely visible orange edge.
Beyond 176 the curve holds about two people in every ten million.
Cox's raw ratings were based on whatever records survived, and she found that thinner records gave lower estimates. To compensate, she published corrected figures that adjusted each estimate for the reliability of its data. As our famous people guide explains, the correction raised the typical childhood figure from about 135 to 155 and the young-adult figure from about 145 to 165.
That is how Leonardo da Vinci, rated 135 and 150 in the raw data, came to be quoted at 180, and Isaac Newton at 190. Neither figure is a test score, and the correction is a statistical argument about missing evidence, not new evidence about either man.
How big a group do you need before someone in it is likely to score 176? About 4,940,195 people. Watch the crowd grow to that size.
One dot per person, and on average only one of them, shown in orange, scores 176 or more.
| Worldwide (8.2 billion people) | about 1,660 |
| India | about 296 |
| United States | about 69 |
| United Kingdom | about 14 |
| Canada | about 8 |
| Australia | about 6 |
Population: World Bank, total population, 2025. Counts assume the same bell curve in every country and are rounded. Real tests can't sort people this finely, as the next sections explain.
Entry to a high-IQ society depends on a percentile, which each one turns into a score per accepted test. Measured under supervision, 176 meets every one of these bars.
Scores for Mensa, Intertel, Triple Nine and ISPE are the Wechsler figures those societies list or that match their percentile. Prometheus and Mega give only a rarity; the scores shown are the matching points on the standard scale. Prometheus says no test currently being given is approved for its entry. Online test results are not accepted by any of them.
The adult Wechsler test and the Stanford-Binet 5 both stop at 160, so neither can give a 176. To report a score this high, a psychologist needs an extended scale, such as the WISC-V extended norms (to 210) or the Stanford-Binet 5 Extended IQ (to 225), shown in the bars below.
Why so uncertain? Because a test compares you with its norm sample, and the WAIS-IV sample had 2,200 adults. The bell curve expects about 0.00045 of them at 176 or higher. With nobody in the sample anywhere near this level, the number comes from the shape of the curve, not from comparison with real people.
There is measurement error too: a professional report would give a range of about 171 to 181 around a 176. With so few people ever measured at this level, the true uncertainty is larger still. Online results are far rougher, which is why ours stops at 145. Are online IQ tests accurate?
Sources: WAIS-IV range and norm sample from Canivez (2010), Mental Measurements Yearbook review; Stanford-Binet 5 and its Extended IQ from PRO-ED; WISC-V extended norms from Pearson Technical Report #6 (2019). Striped bars are extended scales, used only when a person hits the normal ceiling.
The number attached to a result depends on the scale's standard deviation. Near 176, switching scales can add or remove dozens of points for exactly the same rank.
So a "176" isn't always a 176. On the Cattell scale it corresponds to about 148 on the standard scale; on an SD 16 scale, about 171. Why IQ scales differ.
Catharine Cox's 1926 study is the source of nearly every historical "IQ". She estimated each person's score from records of their early life, once for childhood and once for ages 17 to 26. None of them sat a test.

Cox rated him 175 for ages 17 to 26, 1 point below 176. Cox's childhood rating for him was 150.
Cox rated him 175 for ages 17 to 26, 1 point below 176. Cox's childhood rating for him was 165.
Source: Cox, C. M. (1926), Genetic Studies of Genius, Vol. II: The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses, Stanford University Press. Cox stressed that thin records pull estimates down. Read more in where the historical genius IQ estimates came from.
These names are often given an IQ at or close to 176. Not one of the figures is backed by a published test result.
The figure appears on many lists of celebrity IQs with no traceable source.
Sources for every claim are listed in our celebrity IQ list.
Cox noticed that the more reliable a person's records, the higher her raters' estimate tended to be. She concluded that incomplete records introduced "a constant error affecting all of the scores", and that a correction "would raise all of the scores far above their present positions".
She described her correction as "a crude approximation" that "indicates a point below which the true IQ probably did not fall". Popular lists often quote the corrected figures as if they were measurements, which is how many famous people acquired IQs in the 170s, 180s and 190s.
Sources: Cox, C. M. (1926), Genetic Studies of Genius, Vol. II, Stanford University Press; our famous people IQ guide.
A confirmed 176 means a rank of roughly one in five million for your age. Because no adult scale reaches it and childhood ratio scores inflate, a quoted 176 deserves the question every very high number does: which test, at what age, scored which way?
Levels and ranges from Gross, M. U. M. (2000), "Exceptionally and Profoundly Gifted Students: An Underserved Population", Understanding Our Gifted. They are a guide for education, not a ranking of people.
| IQ | Percentile | Rarity | Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 172 | 99.99992nd | 1 in 1,260,512 | Exceptionally gifted |
| 174 | 99.999959th | 1 in 2,474,083 | Exceptionally gifted |
| 176 | 99.999979th | 1 in 4,940,195 | Exceptionally gifted |
| 178 | 99.99999th | 1 in 10,035,701 | Exceptionally gifted |
| 180 | 99.9999951st | 1 in 20,741,280 | Profoundly gifted |
Yes. 176 is a very high IQ: about 1 person in 4,940,195 scores this high or higher, which puts it at the 99.999979th percentile. It is above the 130 that most definitions use for a high IQ, and at or above the 146 used by the Triple Nine Society for its 99.9th percentile entry.
An IQ of 176 is at about the 99.999979th percentile. Only about 0.00002% of people score 176 or higher.
About 1 person in 4,940,195 scores 176 or higher, on the standard bell curve. Across the world's population of about 8.2 billion, that would be roughly 1,660 people.
Yes, by any measure. 176 is higher than about 100% of people. Remember that a score this high needs a supervised professional test to be confirmed, and that it describes reasoning on a test, not every kind of talent.
Yes. Mensa accepts the top 2% on an approved, supervised test, which is about 130 on the standard scale. A supervised 176 would also meet the bar for Intertel, Triple Nine Society, International Society for Philosophical Enquiry, Prometheus Society and Mega Society. Online test results are not accepted.
Mostly because of Catharine Cox's 1926 corrections. Her raw estimates, made from records of each person's youth, were adjusted upwards for missing evidence, raising many into the 170s and beyond. They are estimates, not test results.
Related: what counts as a good IQ score, the highest IQ in the world, famous people's IQs and the full IQ scale and range chart.
An IQ test arrives at a score like 176 by combining several kinds of task. Learn more about abstract reasoning, spatial reasoning, verbal reasoning, processing speed and fluid vs crystallized intelligence, or try the free pattern recognition test.
Many famous IQ figures are guesses. See what is really known about Einstein's IQ, Isaac Newton's IQ, Nikola Tesla's IQ, Stephen Hawking's IQ, Bill Gates' IQ, Elon Musk's IQ, Garry Kasparov's IQ and Terence Tao's IQ.
Try the free Assessivo IQ test: 36 questions, about 25 minutes, and an estimated score up to 145. Confirming a result as high as 176 needs a supervised professional test.
Take the free IQ testPortraits are pencil-style sketches by Assessivo, based on: George Berkeley after John Smibert (about 1727), public domain.