
Cox rated him 170 for ages 17 to 26, the same as this page's score. Cox's childhood rating for him was 130.
Yes, extraordinarily. An IQ of 170 is higher than about 99.99984% of people, roughly 1 in 653,327. In Catharine Cox's 1926 study, Isaac Newton, John Milton, Lord Byron, Victor Hugo and the mathematician Laplace were all rated at about 170 for their young adulthood. And Leta Hollingworth singled out 170 as the level where children "have to contend with loneliness".
At 70 points above the mean of 100 (4.67 standard deviations), 170 sits where the curve has almost flattened onto the axis. Only 0.00015% of people score here or higher; on the left chart that group is the barely visible orange edge.
170 is four and two-thirds standard deviations above average: about 12,600 people in the whole world would score this high or higher.
170 is a favourite number for celebrity IQ lists, and almost none of the figures hold up. Chess grandmaster Judit Polgár, often credited with 170, has no record of any IQ test, as our famous people guide found. The 170s that do have a documented basis are Cox's historical estimates, made from records of each person's youth, which are informed guesses rather than measurements.
Hollingworth's warning is the more useful part of the story. Writing in the 1930s, she observed that children "of 170 IQ and beyond are too intelligent to be understood by the general run of persons with whom they make contact". She did not think this was inevitable; she thought it was a problem of finding the right company.
How big a group do you need before someone in it is likely to score 170? About 653,327 people. Watch the crowd grow to that size.
One dot per person, and on average only one of them, shown in orange, scores 170 or more.
| Worldwide (8.2 billion people) | about 12,600 |
| India | about 2,240 |
| United States | about 523 |
| United Kingdom | about 106 |
| Canada | about 64 |
| Australia | about 42 |
Population: World Bank, total population, 2025. Counts assume the same bell curve in every country and are rounded. Real tests can't sort people this finely, as the next sections explain.
Entry to a high-IQ society depends on a percentile, which each one turns into a score per accepted test. Measured under supervision, 170 meets 5 of the 6 bars; the next, Mega Society, needs about 171.
Scores for Mensa, Intertel, Triple Nine and ISPE are the Wechsler figures those societies list or that match their percentile. Prometheus and Mega give only a rarity; the scores shown are the matching points on the standard scale. Prometheus says no test currently being given is approved for its entry. Online test results are not accepted by any of them.
The adult Wechsler test and the Stanford-Binet 5 both stop at 160, so neither can give a 170. To report a score this high, a psychologist needs an extended scale, such as the WISC-V extended norms (to 210) or the Stanford-Binet 5 Extended IQ (to 225), shown in the bars below.
Why so uncertain? Because a test compares you with its norm sample, and the WAIS-IV sample had 2,200 adults. The bell curve expects about 0.0034 of them at 170 or higher. With nobody in the sample anywhere near this level, the number comes from the shape of the curve, not from comparison with real people.
There is measurement error too: a professional report would give a range of about 165 to 175 around a 170. With so few people ever measured at this level, the true uncertainty is larger still. Online results are far rougher, which is why ours stops at 145. Are online IQ tests accurate?
Sources: WAIS-IV range and norm sample from Canivez (2010), Mental Measurements Yearbook review; Stanford-Binet 5 and its Extended IQ from PRO-ED; WISC-V extended norms from Pearson Technical Report #6 (2019). Striped bars are extended scales, used only when a person hits the normal ceiling.
The number attached to a result depends on the scale's standard deviation. Near 170, switching scales can add or remove dozens of points for exactly the same rank.
So a "170" isn't always a 170. On the Cattell scale it corresponds to about 144 on the standard scale; on an SD 16 scale, about 166. Why IQ scales differ.
Catharine Cox's 1926 study is the source of nearly every historical "IQ". She estimated each person's score from records of their early life, once for childhood and once for ages 17 to 26. None of them sat a test.

Cox rated him 170 for ages 17 to 26, the same as this page's score. Cox's childhood rating for him was 130.

Cox rated him 170 for ages 17 to 26, the same as this page's score. Cox's childhood rating for him was 150.

Cox rated him 170 for ages 17 to 26, the same as this page's score. Cox's childhood rating for him was 145.
Source: Cox, C. M. (1926), Genetic Studies of Genius, Vol. II: The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses, Stanford University Press. Cox stressed that thin records pull estimates down. Read more in where the historical genius IQ estimates came from.
These names are often given an IQ at or close to 170. Not one of the figures is backed by a published test result.
The strongest female chess player in history, but no record of any IQ test could be found behind the figure.
Sources for every claim are listed in our celebrity IQ list.
Hollingworth wrote that children of 170 IQ and beyond "are too infrequent to find many congenial companions. They have to contend with loneliness and with personal isolation from their contemporaries throughout the period of immaturity."
Her remedy, developed over two decades of work, was to bring such children together with intellectual peers. Modern research on acceleration, such as Miraca Gross's 20-year Australian study, points the same way: the isolation is real, but it responds to how schools and families organise a child's learning and friendships.
Source: Hollingworth, L. S. (1942), Children Above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and Development, World Book Company (Project Gutenberg edition).
A confirmed IQ of 170 means reasoning at a level found in about three people in two million. It is in the "exceptionally gifted" band, well beyond the ceiling of standard clinical tests, and only extended scales can report it. On the Cattell scale, the same rank would be printed as 212.
Levels and ranges from Gross, M. U. M. (2000), "Exceptionally and Profoundly Gifted Students: An Underserved Population", Understanding Our Gifted. They are a guide for education, not a ranking of people.
| IQ | Percentile | Rarity | Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 166 | 99.99945th | 1 in 184,756 | Exceptionally gifted |
| 168 | 99.9997th | 1 in 344,471 | Exceptionally gifted |
| 170 | 99.99984th | 1 in 653,327 | Exceptionally gifted |
| 172 | 99.99992nd | 1 in 1,260,512 | Exceptionally gifted |
| 174 | 99.999959th | 1 in 2,474,083 | Exceptionally gifted |
Yes. 170 is a very high IQ: about 1 person in 653,327 scores this high or higher, which puts it at the 99.99984th percentile. It is above the 130 that most definitions use for a high IQ, and at or above the 146 used by the Triple Nine Society for its 99.9th percentile entry.
Some can show the number, but very few can measure it. Our own test reports up to 145, because a short online test doesn't have enough very hard questions, or enough high scorers in its data, to separate 170 from nearby scores. A supervised Wechsler or Stanford-Binet assessment is needed to confirm it.
About 212. The Cattell scale uses a standard deviation of 24 instead of 15, so the same result gives a bigger number. Going the other way, a Cattell score of 170 is only about 144 on the standard scale.
An IQ of 170 is at about the 99.99984th percentile. Only about 0.00015% of people score 170 or higher.
About 1 person in 653,327 scores 170 or higher, on the standard bell curve. Across the world's population of about 8.2 billion, that would be roughly 12,600 people.
No living person has a publicly documented IQ test score of 170. Lists credit figures such as Judit Polgár with 170 without any test record. In Catharine Cox's 1926 historical study, Isaac Newton, John Milton, Lord Byron, Victor Hugo and Pierre-Simon Laplace were estimated at about 170 for ages 17 to 26.
Related: what counts as a good IQ score, the highest IQ in the world, famous people's IQs and the full IQ scale and range chart.
An IQ test arrives at a score like 170 by combining several kinds of task. Learn more about fluid vs crystallized intelligence, abstract reasoning, spatial reasoning, verbal reasoning and processing speed, or try the free pattern recognition test.
Many famous IQ figures are guesses. See what is really known about Nikola Tesla's IQ, Stephen Hawking's IQ, Bill Gates' IQ, Elon Musk's IQ, Garry Kasparov's IQ, Terence Tao's IQ, Einstein's IQ and Isaac Newton's IQ.
Try the free Assessivo IQ test: 36 questions, about 25 minutes, and an estimated score up to 145. Confirming a result as high as 170 needs a supervised professional test.
Take the free IQ testPortraits are pencil-style sketches by Assessivo, based on: Isaac Newton after Godfrey Kneller (1689), public domain. Victor Hugo from a photograph by Étienne Carjat (1876), public domain. John Milton after an anonymous portrait (about 1629), public domain.